ANTIKOR — national anti-corruption portal
Kyiv: 8°C
Kharkiv: 8°C
Dnipro: 8°C
Odesa: 8°C
Chernihiv: 9°C
Sumy: 8°C
Lviv: 4°C
Uzhhorod: 8°C
Lutsk: 4°C
Rivne: 3°C

In the Lviv region, a man won a court case to overturn the refusal of the Military Commissariat for a deferral

Читати українськоюЧитать на русском
In the Lviv region, a man won a court case to overturn the refusal of the Military Commissariat for a deferral
In the Lviv region, a man won a court case to overturn the refusal of the Military Commissariat for a deferral

As indicated in the court register data, a resident of the Lviv region appealed to one of the district TRCs with a request for postponement due to caring for a father with a second group disability.

In the Lviv region, TRC and SS employees refused to grant a deferral from mobilization to a conscript. He stated that the reason was caring for his father, who has a second group disability, for which he provided the necessary documents.

This was reported by Zaxid.net.

In January 2025, a decision published in the court register stated that a resident of the Lviv region filed an application to the district TRC for postponement due to caring for his father with a second group disability.

He sent the application by mail and attached copies of passports, a certificate to the MSEC act, and his father’s pension certificate. However, in October 2024, the commission denied the deferment, citing the lack of a complete set of documents under paragraph 13, clause 1 of the Cabinet of Ministers’ resolution dated 16.05.2024 No. 560.

The case was reviewed by Judge Roman Brylevskyi, who examined all the materials and arguments. He established that the plaintiff attached all documents required by law to his application, and TRC representatives did not specify which documents were missing.

Based on the verdict, the judge stated that the defendant did not properly review the plaintiff’s application and all the evidence. They did not verify the validity of the grounds for deferral based on the submitted documents, which is why the defendant’s decision is considered unlawful, the judge noted.

The court ordered to review the plaintiff’s documents for the granting of postponement again. An appeal can also be filed.


Topics: Lviv regionCourtTRC

Date and time 26 January 2025 г., 23:41     Views Views: 2045
Comments Comments: 0


Comments:

comments powered by Disqus
02 November 2025 y.
loading...
Загрузка...

Our polls

Do you believe Donald Trump will be able to stop the war between Russia and Ukraine?







Show Poll results
Show all polls on the website
0.040473